Call us: (905) 366 9700

Legal Blog

Fraudulent Conveyance / Preference

Posted on December 16, 2016 | Posted in Collections, Five Liners

Bearsfield Developments Inc. v. McNabb 2016 Ont SCJ

Employee embezzled funds between 2006 and 2011 and then retired. In 2012, she paid $207,000 to an insurer for an annuity. An annuity, or a registered plan with an insurance component, cannot be seized and sold by a creditor. One month later, the employer discovered the embezzlement. The employee was ultimately convicted and the employer obtained a default judgment of approximately $1 million. Their employer moved under the Fraudulent Conveyances Act to set aside the transfer of the money into the annuity. Even though the employer was not a creditor at the time of the transfer, the court held that the employee had an intent to defeat the employer by way of the transfer of seizable money into a non-seizable asset. The court set aside the transfer.

 

Jonathan Speigel

 

Written by Jonathan Speigel Jonathan Speigel, the founding partner of Speigel Nichols Fox LLP, leads the litigation and construction practices.

 

Share:

Download our free checklist:

“10 Questions to ask before hiring a law firm”

DOWNLOAD

Speigel Nichols Fox LLP